|
1/21/08
Dearest Sexa,
Before I say anything else, I want to tell you that you're one of my
heroes. "On Female
Arrogance" basically
changed my life. I've
spent a lot of
time apologizing for either my looks or my intelligence, even though
boys who
are unabashedly smart and good-looking (obviously) make me weak at the
knees. No longer! I'm a smart, sexy bitch, and
people have had
to deal with that since I read your essay. More
people probably gossip about me behind my
back than before, but I'm also having really great sex with a really
hot guy,
so I'd say it's a net positive.
I think you're a brilliant writer. Part
of that is just because your beliefs line up with mine pretty well for
the most
part, and you often express things in ways I hadn't thought of. But part of it is because
you've actually
opened my eyes and changed my mind about a lot of things. I delved into The 1585 real
skeptically,
because I don't like James Joyce very much, and my relationship with
Camille
Paglia is love-hate at best, and James and Camille are, like, two of
your main bitches.
But you've
sliced right through my
skepticism and convinced me that BDSM and submission can totally be an
expression of feminism. And
that bit in
your latest essay about having sex because summer's ending and the
world is
beautiful? That is
so true, and I had
never realized it.
There's just this one thing that no amount of your staggering
rhetorical
prowess has been able to convince me of: that ugly fat girls are
ruining
everything for the rest of us. I
mean, I
definitely agree that SOME ugly fat girls are ruining stuff, because I
definitely agree that jealousy is one of the main factors that religion
and feminism
and society are all fucked up. (My
kid
sister a few months ago: "Sometimes I get really mad at her, and I hate
her, but then I remember that she's a total slut, so I'm just a better
person
than she is, and then I feel better.") But
I
see a lot of attractive girls (like, for example, my sister) taking up
this
attitude, too, so it's not as if the ugly fat girls have a monopoly on
incorporating jealousy into their world view and using it to the
detriment of
society.
And here's
the main reason for that, I think: Ugly is a REALLY
subjective term.
In "Men Are the New Women," you defined ugly women as "women who
think they're ugly, who've bought into our national self-loathing, and
instead
of doing something about it, are looking to blame everyone but
themselves." And I
can get behind
that. Your
definition, though, also
seemed to include "women who are not aesthetically pleasing," and
that's where I stop understanding your argument. Not
aesthetically pleasing to whom? Pretty
much everyone out there appeals to
SOMEONE. There's
more than just the Dita
von Teese vs. Jessica Simpson versions of attractiveness laid out in
"The
Other N-Word." Some
people are quite
taken with girls who make no effort to be attractive. I
have this one almost inexplicable friend who
exclusively wears baggy sweatpants and sweatshirts, refuses to put on
makeup or
do her hair, but is constantly getting laid by, and having
relationships with, decent-looking, moderately cool guys. She
styles herself the way she does partially because she doesn't want to
have to conform
to bullshit standards of beauty, but I have known her for years, and
I've never
heard her belittle women (like myself) who do make an effort to be
beautiful,
nor have I ever heard her use "slut" or "whore" as disparaging terms,
like my sister did last paragraph. This friend of mine is an
"ugly"
girl who isn't ruining it for everyone else.
Because, I mean, aren't fashion-magazine standards kind of bullshit? Don't get me wrong, I am
all for making an
effort to be attractive; it takes me a looong time to get ready in the
morning,
and then I have to bike to class wearing high heels, which is a total
pain in
the ass (but totally worth it). But
the
women in those magazines go through hours of professional makeup application and hairstyling, and then they
get Photoshopped
all to hell. My
nose is always going to
be wider than those girls' noses, but, then again, half those girls'
noses have
been sliced up by surgery or computer programs. My
nose doesn't conform to those beauty
standards, but men seem to be attracted to me anyway, and I seem to get
laid
anyway, so isn't it bullshit that every time I look at a billboard or
fashion magazine
I'm told my nose should be different from the way it is?
I know you're not saying that there is no non-conformist beauty, so I
don't
want to sound like I'm accusing you of that. Obviously
you esteem individuality and
creativity in all aspects of life.
But, dang, you hate on the fat girls! "...'boys' can be taken to mean both actual boys
as well as any girls who are both extremely intelligent and not fat"?
Harsh! "...fat
girls blame 'the media' for people not
wanting to fuck them because they’re fat, when it’s
simple aesthetics to prefer
a well-proportioned and toned body"? Is
this really "simple aesthetics"? I
myself am a skinny bitch (and have the midriff-baring
pictures of me in ridiculous slutty schoolgirl outfits to prove it),
but I find
lots of fat women attractive. And
lots
of men find lots of fat women attractive. And
I find lots of fat men attractive, too,
for that matter. In
fact, I think
muscular men are nice to look at, but I find men who are either pudgy
or faux-anorexic-hipster
skinny much more attractive, and those are the men I fuck. Maybe this is just an issue
of semantics,
because there are definitely folks who cross the line into morbid
obesity, but
I have no problem finding moderately fat people attractive. And I don't like the idea
that all fat people
without exception are just hella shoving Cheetos down their throats and
only
exercising when they shift from one ass cheek to the other on the
couch. My sister is
in WAY better shape than I am,
but even though she exercises probably twice or even three times as
much as I
do, is stronger than I am, has better endurance than I do, etc., etc.,
etc., she's
still about thirty pounds fatter than I am, and always will be. As long as your weight isn't
infringing on
your health, I don't see a problem with it. Women
can be sexy and healthy at pretty much
every size. And I
think it's fair that fat
girls protest mainstream media beauty standards, because they ARE
somewhat arbitrary
and people ARE bombarded with these images and messages since birth,
and most
people are too stupid to ever escape ideologically from that
bombardment.
The same goes for masculine and feminine appearances. You
say that you "believe, strongly, in
femininity and masculinity." I
basically do, too, and to a limited extent I agree that "physical
strength
and prowess is sexy" in men. But
don't tell me you've never wanted to fuck the guy in eyeliner and
women's jeans,
or the girl in the suit with the dyke-y haircut. I
find a lot of thin women and muscular men
sexy, but there are so many other forms of sexiness, and I do think
there is an
element of "brainwashing, conservative media" that restricts a huge
amount
of people to only finding one type of sexiness attractive.
Plus, doesn't someone become more physically attractive when their
personality
becomes more attractive to you? You
mention unattractive guys you've slept with who were kind and funny and
good in
bed... didn't they
become more aesthetically
pleasing to you as you got to know them better and liked them more? I think that the mainstream
media teaches us
overwhelmingly to judge people, especially women, by their looks only,
and
never address the fact that judging people by their personalities
actually affects
your perception of their attractiveness level.
Maybe I'm misreading you, and I'm probably expressing myself
imperfectly, too. But
sometimes ugly fat girls are sexy! And
certainly not ALL ugly and/or fat girls
are tearing society apart the way you seem to think they are. And sometimes pretty and/or
skinny girls DO tear
society apart like that.
One more small point: I agree with virtually everything else you say
about Bad
Feminism vs. Good Feminism, but I want to ask you if you think Bad
Feminism is
as prevalent as it comes off in the essays on The 1585 site. I spend, I don't know,
probably an hour a day
reading liberal (mainly feminist) blogs, and while they differ from The
1585 in
that they emphasize the evils of patriarchy and media-approved
standards of
beauty, they are very much in agreement with you about the advent of
the
"sensitive" misogynist, the ills of slut-shaming, and the idea that
sex is fucking rad and everyone should have as much of it as they want. And
they may not proclaim
that liberals are smart and conservatives are stupid, but they do a
pretty good
job of viciously mocking specific conservatives (as well as stupid
liberals) pretty
constantly. I am just a baby undergrad feminist, but the majority
of my experience as a feminist has been what you call (and
what I
agree is) Good Feminism. I
only say this
because I want to tell you that there is hope for the feminist movement
yet!
In conclusion, this is a long email. I
am
sorry about that, but I am a Creative Writing major who likes to hear
herself
type. And I hope
this email doesn't come
off as TOO terribly critical, because I have only a teaspoon of
criticism to
offer in comparison to the voluminous floods of admiration I feel for
you.
So, that's all.
Lots of love and kisses and stuff,
—Lauren
O.
Dearest Lauren O.:
First of all, thank you so much for your incredibly kind
words. I really
can't begin to tell you how much your response to the site and to my
writing
means to me. Your description of the way in which 'On Female
Arrogance" changed your life had me grinning all day. I'm
thrilled
that you're now able to see that BDSM and female submission can be
expressions
of power. And I'm superlatively thrilled to be in any way
responsible for
hot people having hot sex with one another. Consider yourself
officially
part of my Pin-Up Army of Hot Girl Geniuses.
I should also apologize for taking such a long time to get back to
you.
These issues are both very important to and extremely personal for me,
so I
wanted to make sure my response did them, and your wonderful email,
justice.
My opinion on beauty and body image is something I've felt that I
haven't fully
or responsibly clarified in my writing on the 1585. I'm
grateful that
your extremely well-expressed criticisms give me a chance to clarify my
position on these issues.
First of all, I couldn't agree more both that beauty is subjective and
that the
way models look in fashion magazines or on the runway has little do
with what
women look like in any day-to-day context. People too often
forget that
fashion models are traditionally stick-thin not
because the fashion industry is attempting to create and perpetuate a
standard
of beauty, but rather because the point of runway shows and fashion
print ads
isn't the models, it's the clothes. Clothes hang best, their
make and
craftsmanship is best shown off, on a straight-up-and-down
body. A
curvier model's body is more likely to pull focus from clothing not
because a
curvier model wouldn't necessarily look as good in the clothes, but
because her
body would do something to the clothes. A
designer wants to
display their clothes as made and as rendered with as little external
influence
as possible. It's the same reason painters generally prefer
to display
their paintings on white walls. And of course a woman who has
had
technicians spend hours lighting her perfectly will not look in a way
it's
possible to look when going about your day, no matter how beautiful you
are. I have plenty of friends who are professional models,
and they're
all gorgeous, but they don't ever look in daily life the way they do in
professional photographs.
And of course beauty is incredibly
subjective. But one of the
things we're protesting by using the words fat
and ugly in the copious and
“harsh”
way we do at The 1585 is the idea that having a standard of beauty at
all
means stringently and without exception believing in fashion-magazine
beauty. The sweatshirts-and-sweatpants friend you describe
sounds pretty
awesome, and I know a fair number of girls like that. It's
understandable
why you would assume that I'd put her in the category of "ugly girls
who
are ruining it for everyone," but I don't at all. When I say
"ugly," I literally mean unattractive. I
mean someone to whom people are not
attracted. Obviously,
your friend isn't in
that category. People are attracted to her and, I'd hazard,
the fact that
she's successfully attractive and is getting regularly laid is much of
why she
doesn't belittle women who are making an effort to be
beautiful—she doesn't
have reason to be angry or bitter on that topic. Therefore,
the example
of your friend in fact supports our oft-repeated thesis that attractive
people
are generally nicer than ugly people.
The positive body-image movement in feminism is a fantastically
well-intentioned thing. There's pretty much no way to argue with the
idea that
we should all be as happy with ourselves as possible. As
you point out, that's part of what I'm
saying when I define "ugly girls" as "women...
who've bought into our national self-loathing, and instead of
doing something about it, are looking to blame everyone but themselves."
When we're happy with ourselves, we treat other people generally
better, and so
it's better for everyone that we all try to love how we look.
But I believe this fantastically well-intentioned movement to have had
unfortunate widespread negative results. Hardly anyone yet
talks about
these negative consequences. With my writing at the 1585, I'm
attempting to
bring them to light in a way that I hope will help women struggling
with
negative body image.
One of the reasons I use the word fat
in the unpopularly harsh way I do is that the word's been made taboo by
most
feminists. Because it's been made taboo, it now has a great
deal of power.
You never hear anyone just throw around "fat" as an adjective or an
insult anymore. Body-image rhetoric tells us that no-one is
fat and that
we aren't allowed to call ourselves or anyone else fat. At
the same time,
the part of body-image feminism that's engaged in a big make-out
session with
Dworkin/MacKinnon-influenced victim feminism tells girls that what's
wrong with
society is that everyone thinks you're fat if you don't look like a
model. So you get girls self-identifying as "fat" if they're
anything other than stick-skinny. You
get women basing a significant part of their identity on the idea that
"I'm fat because I'm not skinny, and that makes me angry and
awesome." One of the difficulties with feminism is that by
talking
up oppression, it encourages women to internalize that oppression even
if it
hasn't actually been perpetrated against them. Unfortunately,
body-image
feminism often reinforces the very ideas it purportedly seeks to
eradicate,
specifically that of the skinny/fat binary (the idea that you're either
rail
thin or fat and there's no in-between). Therefore, this kind
of feminism
is as much a cause of negative body image as the standards of beauty
perpetuated by fashion magazines.
As I think I've made no effort to hide in the scantily clad photos of
myself
included in every article, I'm not a skinny bitch. I'm not
fat, either,
but I'm definitely too curvy to ever be described as skinny, and
certainly
don't have a runway model's figure. Negative body
image is
something with which I struggle every day. I don't dismiss
these issues,
nor do I talk about them lightly. I was
anorexic and occasionally bulimic between ages
twelve and
fourteen. After that I gained back enough weight that I was
the fat girl
all through high school. I hated my body either constantly or
on-and-off
until a few years ago when I started doing burlesque, which has changed
my life
in numerous ways, one of them being that it made me able to think of
myself as
attractive. I've only quite recently realized it could be a
positive,
powerful thing to want to lose weight and get in better
shape. Now that
I'm finally starting to love how I look for the first time in my life
(yes, partially
because of thinking differently, but also because I've been eating
right and
exercising and so actually do look better), I've
been examining
heavily what it was that created all this self-loathing centered on my
physical
body.
You say you "find lots of fat
women attractive... and... find lots of fat men attractive, too, for
that
matter." You
go on to mention
liking "pudgy" men and "moderately fat people," and mention
that this might just be an issue of semantics. I
think you're right that that's what it is,
but this issue of semantics may be the crux of the whole problem.
When I say "fat," I don't mean curvy. I don't mean
soft.
I don't mean zaftig. I don't mean bouncy. I don't
mean pudgy.
I don't mean anyone who isn't rail-thin or purely muscular. I
actually
mean fat. I mean prohibitively
overweight. Your assumption that
I condemn anyone not absolutely thin when I say "fat girls" is
demonstrative of the way in which body-image feminism reinforces the
thin/fat
binary. Words such as "curvy," "womanly,"
"bouncy," "zaftig," "statuesque" and, ironically
enough, "healthy" are used to describe women who are just severely
and unavoidably fat. Therefore, when those same words are
used accurately to
describe someone who is not fat but legitimately curvy, the result is
that the
curvy girl assumes she's being called "fat." Thin
is different from skinny. Slender
is different from thin. Statuesque is different from
slender. Curvy
is different from statuesque. I could go on for quite some
time doing
this, and none of these words means fat, despite
the fact that they do
mean not-skinny. Precision of language might save the world
if we could
all commit to it.
The "moderately fat" people you mention are people who I would likely
never think of as fat, and who rightly shouldn't be described with that
word. But defending not-skinny people in this manner in fact
reinforces
the skinny-girl/fat-girl binary. Such a defense shuffles
everyone who
isn't extremely thin all the way over into the "fat and therefore
oppressed" category, by assuming they need to be defended
against
anyone attacking fat people. I do make harsh statements about
fat girls a
lot, but I don't ever claim that only skinny girls are
attractive. You
mention that your sister, despite her working out and being healthy and
in
fantastic shape, will always weigh more than you due to her natural
body
type. But (I can't say this for sure as I've never met your
sister) I'm
pretty sure that I would never describe your sister as fat. I
object to a
feminism that tells her that anyone would call her fat, or that there's
any reason
for her not to self-identify as thin. Just because she's not
skinny
shouldn't mean that she should be called fat, or even
"fatter."
The word fat should be reserved for people who are undeniably
overweight, not
someone who works out, eats well, and still might possibly be
accurately
described as curvy.
You say you "don't like the idea
that all fat people without exception are just hella shoving Cheetos
down their
throats and only exercising when they shift from one ass cheek to the
other on
the couch," but those are the people I
mean when I use the word
"fat." I don't mean people like your sister, who may not be
capable of ever being super-skinny, but are still in great shape and
really hot
if even they have a somewhat larger build. I know plenty of
women who are
(in the traditional sense) curvy or soft, who wear larger sizes and
whom I find
devastatingly attractive. I'd much rather fuck most of the
burlesque
girls I know, many of whom are beautifully
curvy, than most of the
women on America's Next Top Model.
I love the new Agent Provocateur campaign—their two newest
lines each feature
in the campaign one rail-thin model and one curvier model, and the
contrast is
incredibly hot, among other reasons because it points out how there's
not one
body type that's most attractive and in fact what's exciting
about
bodies is how different they are from one another.
And the issue of attractiveness being about far more than just
measurements
certainly comes into play here. There are some women who are
so convinced
that they're fat, and defined by feeling that way and not doing
anything about
it, that all you can see when you're around them is the idea of a fat
girl. Another woman who had the exact same body might make an
effort to
make herself attractive, to dress in a flattering way, to believe that
she's
sexy, and therefore you'd never think of the word "fat" when around
her. I've also often slept with people who didn't have ideal
magazine
bodies, but I never thought of them as anything but "sexy," because
that's
what they focused on and how they carried themselves.
There is
objectively such a thing as overweight,
however, and while all people's bodies tend to settle at or
around a
different ideal healthy weight and shape, anyone who eats crap and
never works
out is going to look a lot better if they start eating well and
exercising. In order to combat the pressure to be skinny that
is
certainly to a degree exerted on women by the media, body-image
feminists have
gone all the way to the other extreme and now tell you that trying to
change
your body at all means that you
hate
yourself, and that the only "real" beauty is one where you never make an effort to change your body
shape. I understand why this rhetoric is appealing.
But what it
potentially can do is lock women in a useless, paralytic cycle of
endless
regenerative self-hatred.
Not being allowed to say "fat," not being allowed to think of
any body shape as unappealing, means not being allowed to say
"Ok, I
don't like X, Y and Z about how my body looks. What
can I do to change this?" When
I tell most women I know that I want to
lose 20 pounds, they tell me I look perfect the way I am and start
questioning
me about the psychology of my desire to lose weight. But
I don't want to lose 20 pounds as some
equivalent to cutting myself—I want to lose 20 pounds in the
same way I want to
always talk like a 1930s screwball comedy and paint my
eyeliner as
expertly as Dita paints hers and write sentences as good as F. Scott
Fitzgerald's: I am making an effort to be the ideal version of
myself. It's hard fucking work, and it's the
most empowering thing
anyone can do. The fact that I work hard to perfect myself is
what allows
me to love how I look.
In his essay "The Other N-Word," Grammaticus wrote about hotness as
"art, not chance." I like the idea of beauty being,
just
like intelligence and artistic or professional accomplishment,
something for
which you have to fight and therefore something of which you can be
proud. Part of the reason we're taught to apologize for being
hot is that
attractiveness is considered, or supposed to be considered, an
accident,
something outside of your control. People base their
resentment of
attractive people on the fact that it's luck, rather than hard work,
when, of
course, it takes just as much time, sweat, and effort to be
successfully
attractive as to be successfully intelligent. It's part of
why I think
high heels and make-up and decorative extreme femininity are, and
should be
recognized as, signs of strength. It's like how you mention
taking an
hour to get ready, and biking to class in high heels (which I love,
love, love
by the way); these things are difficult but you
do them anyway in
order to be attractive, and that empowers you.
Body-image feminism paints
self-esteem as an obligation to
laziness. It backs up that figuration by preaching the idea,
which is
supposed to help women accept their bodies, that not only is it bad
to
try to change your body, it's not really possible.
I can't tell
you how many girls have told me "Well, you have the type of body that
isn't ever going to be thin, no matter what you do." Out of
context,
that's a total insult, right? But these were well-intentioned
feminists
who meant their remarks to mean "you should love and accept your body."
I was amazed
when I started working out
and my body shape did in fact
change
quickly and noticeably—this was what I'd been told was "not
possible"
for me. Just think: these people would probably have told the
1984
version of Madonna that she was "never going to be thin no matter what
she
did," but look at her a few years later (or, for that matter,
now)!
This mentality is simply a matter of "misery loves
company," no
different from how an alcoholic's friends who are also alcoholics don't
want
him to get sober.
So, in a way that may seem
backward, I hate on fat girls in
order to defend girls who aren't skinny. I
love skinny girls, too, and part of what I'm
doing in trying to eradicate the idiotic skinny/fat binary is to get
the
majority of women to stop talking about and treating skinny women as
though
they were some foreign race of aliens. But
I also think that if more women could use the word fat
to mean what it really means, then maybe nine out of every ten
women I meet wouldn't hate their bodies and call themselves fat,
because they'd
understand that fat is an objective assessment, not some big secret,
and
doesn't mean them—plus, the women who actually are
fat might be more
likely to try and lose weight (which they really should do, even if
only for
health reasons), because they could no longer hide behind this
denial-enabling
"fat just means everyone who isn't a model" defense.
As to your point about
femininity and masculinity, I do
believe strongly in both, and I also am most often attracted to "the
girl
in the suit with the dyke-y haircut" and "the guy in eyeliner and
women's jeans." The
fact that both
these aesthetics are successfully sexually compelling only demonstrates
the
power of femininity and masculinity. Masculinity
is compelling on a woman, and
femininity on a man, because it's not what we expect to see, and
therefore
fascinates. But I
don't consider these
things to be outside of a high standard of beauty, and by writing about
aesthetic standards, I'm trying to demonstrate that the idea of having
a
classical aesthetic standard does not mean only wanting to fuck
football
players and skinny smiling blondes with big tits. It's
pretty much the same binary. Too
many people assume that there's only the
absolute magazine picture mainstream, or crazy fat weirdos, and nothing
in
between. I think
the idea of classical
beauty is corrupted when people assume it only applies to fashion
models and
male bodybuilders. I
find both fashion
models and male bodybuilders attractive, but I think assuming anyone
who talks
about a standard of beauty, or about masculinity and femininity as
real,
powerful things, would only be attracted to these
mainstream
"ideals" is cheapening the idea of beauty.
And lastly, I'm thrilled to
hear you cite other examples of
"Good Feminism" out there. It's
true that many of the problems we're addressing in feminism are well
known as
problems, and have a fantastically healthy amount of opposition
already. It's great
that your experience as a feminist
has so far been good, and I hope you can share that experience with as
many
other people who may not have yet caught on as possible. Because that's what we're
trying to help you
do, and trying to do ourselves.
Anyway, thank you again so much
for your insightful
questions and compliments. Now
all I
have to do is get you to love James Joyce. Seriously,
how can you not love James Joyce?
With Love and High Heels,
—Sexa Rubelucia
Back to the Top
Back to Reader Mail Central
Back to the Home Page
|
|